Saturday, June 20, 2015

Crime Blog of the Week



In the film Watchmen as well as its source material the character of Rorschach believes himself to be in a city that is corrupt and sees a diseased society.   I think it can be argued that "M" shows us this same type of diseased society that Rorschach believes he inhabits. When we go to a bar in "M" it isn't glamors we see rotten food and spilled drinks.  The cops and criminals it's hard to distinguish the two they both sit around and smoke cigars pretty non-nonchalant about the event's transpiring.  At a point in the film we see a mob mentality an innocent old-man is attacked suspect of being the killer in a form of vigilant justice. Seemingly unable to control their base desire much like the killer claims that there is an evil that just compels him to murder children.  The system is one that is corrupt that hurts the innocent.  The ones that do are  unsympathetic and while we the audience may see the criminals that want to hunt down the child murder as a anti-hero the film through the murder reminds us that these other criminals are  just as bad. I feel it paints a bleak view of the system and one where only the Children are yet untoched by it's evil. I feel this film is  a warning of sorts of what's to come when put in the historical context,  Lang hates Nazism and it's on the rise when it's release and with this he' telling us something doesn't smell right.

In contrast if "M" just shows us a corrupt system and just says "that's just how it is" what does "The Bicycle thief" tell us.  It gives us a reason of why the system is flawed. "The  Bicycle thief" is a tale of an unfair system as well it's not inherently evil just flawed. Crime isn't something that taints us and puts us in the "evil" box it's a more complex issue than that. Though  theft and murder are two extreme sides of the spectrum though some see it all the same. The common saying is "if there in jail their criminals who cares why they are there."   This film though shows us that criminals are bad or evil necessarily but may be  a misguided individual.    Antonio's turn to crime is one of desperation.  In his time of need no came to help him the police were useless and no good Samaritans to be found.   Was it due to social standing maybe?  Though what we do know is that when he finally got in the W column life was cruel and took it away from him.  The bike was an achievement quickly robbed by someone trying to make it by. Antonio in the end turns to crime because he too is trying to make it by.
It's a cycle the system is a wheel that spins and spins.  Could if be fixed here certainly?  To me it all echos back to "To eat like that, you need a million lira a month at least."   The game's been rigged from the start and many have been doomed to fail.

(This film also shows us mob justice in it's chase scene at the end over the stolen bike at the end though here again while a crime was committed by the individual it can be argued that such forms of justice aren't really justice they focus on punishment rather than rehabilitation which can be argued and many strongly feel is what things should led to. We shouldn't seek just punishment but aim for rehabilitation) 

1 comment:

  1. *Seemingly unable to control their base desire much like the killer

    Good point---if police and criminals are the same, are they much different from the killer--BT obviously has a different approach to law, which seems constantly usurped by mobs.

    ReplyDelete